Sillok Metrics
한국어
Other pages in this series (34)
Editions comparedshare

Historians' comments in revised editions

Share of articles with a historian's comment, original and revised side by side.

20.2%share with comments, Sukjong Supplement and Corrections
Key point

According to NIKH's tags the revisions carry almost no commentary (a single comment in the Revised Seonjo records), compared with the 52 counted by Oh Hang-nyeong. Count '史臣曰' in the text, not the tags, when working on revised editions.

Formula
Articles with comments / all articles, per edition
How to read it
If a revision changes judgments through commentary, its share should exceed the original's.
Caveats
NIKH tagging. The Revised Seonjo records carry only one tagged comment, compared with the 52 counted by Oh Hang-nyeong, so tagging gaps are likely and are noted in the table.
External check
Oh Hang-nyeong (2004): 52 comments on 40 persons in the Revised Seonjo records.
Reliability card
exactExact count — read straight from the source XML

Oh Hang-nyeong (2004): 52 comments on 40 persons in the Revised Seonjo records.

EditionArticles (A)Articles (B)B/ACharacters (A)Characters (B)B/AShared daysOf B's daysOf A's daysHistorians' comments AHistorians' comments B
Veritable Records of King Seonjo → Revised Veritable Records of King Seonjo26,7161,8740.0704,644,626449,5810.09727160.1%3.4%2.59%0.05%
Veritable Records of King Hyeonjong → Supplemented Veritable Records of King Hyeonjong9,29610,5061.1301,030,9511,382,4121.3413,77484.1%94.7%2.32%0.46%
Veritable Records of King Sukjong → Supplement and Corrections to the Veritable Records of King Sukjong24,2097290.0303,311,227213,5330.06460189.4%4.9%0.96%20.16%
Veritable Records of King Gyeongjong → Revised Veritable Records of King Gyeongjong2,7444310.157354,711119,4050.33730999.0%23.9%1.49%1.39%
Daily Records of Gwanghaegun, second draft → Daily Records of Gwanghaegun, final draft22,12118,8050.8502,739,9122,244,1560.8194,92099.9%96.9%0.94%0.00%

Download CSV: b_pairs.csv